An insurance nightmare is looming for thousands of New Zealand property owners who’ve invested in buildings with reinforced concrete slabs built since 2012.
There may also be serious repercussions for property prices in Auckland, and other areas with grossly over inflated values, if buildings become uninsurable because of the presence of sub-standard steel reinforcing.
The reinforcing steel mesh is used in multi-storey buildings and concrete slabs to make them more resilient in an earthquake. It’s supposed to stretch by at least 10%.
The standard was raised from 2% after the Christchurch earthquake. Lack of ductility was the reason why the CTV building collapsed, killing 115 people.
In more bad news today, the public was told private insurers will take over Kaikoura earthquake claims from the Earthquake Commission.
The agreement lists the following insurers as agents for EQC claims: AA Insurance, Farmers’ Mutual Group & FMG Insurance, IAG New Zealand (State, AMI, Lumley, NZI and Lantern brands), Medical Insurance Society Limited (MAS brand) QBE Insurance (Australia), Tower New Zealand, Vero Insurance New Zealand, and Youi NZ. source
NZ government, criticized. Substandard Chinese steel failed strength tests
The substandard steel first came to light in early June 2016 when steel from China and supplied by Steel & Tube Holdings, used in concrete road bridges, failed strength tests.
An international steel trader said
Playing down the threat of substandard steel that made it past controls and into New Zealand roads, bridges and buildings is reckless of the government
Fulton Hogan and HEB Construction chose a cheap bid by Steel and Tube to import 1600 tonnes for new bridges on the Huntly Bypass, and ended up with Chinese test certificates that proved worthless.
Ian Jacob – who has been sourcing steel from China for two decades, said the contractors knew the risks in a glutted world steel market. Mr Jacob is a shareholder in Mill-Pro Hong Kong, a business that has supplied fabricated structural steel to companies in Australasia for 10 years. He told RNZ News the contractors had been “wilfully blind”.
Fulton Hogan and HEB, who are among the biggest New Zealand road builders, used the substandard steel after running out of time on the Huntly project. The steel was strengthened with extra concrete, using hurriedly revamped designs…. read on
“If this is what they’re doing on a State Highway project, you can imagine what’s going on in the private sector,” said Mr Jacob.
On 2 June 2016 Transport Minister, the aptly named Simon Bridges ruled out any government investigation, saying it was a small batch of steel from China and it was very unlikely to happen again.
But Mr Jacob said he did not know how the Minister could make such a statement. “Frankly, that’s quite reckless honestly to say that, because how does he know anything about the steel industry whatsoever and where’s that information coming from?
Damage Caused by Kaikoura Earthquake 14 November 2016
Sixteen blocks in Wellington were damaged by the recent Kaikoura earthquake. Alarmingly, some of them were new buildings, or renovated to meet modern day EQ code.
Note, buildings which are likely to have been built with the substandard steel mesh may include many of the new structures recently erected in Christchurch. Some of those damaged in and around Kaikoura, and some of the properties in the 16 damaged blocks in Wellington may also be affected.
An estimated 11% of Wellington CBD’s office space has been closed: that’s nearly 17 hectares of floor area, half of it in prime building stock. source
Coincidentally, John Key announced his resignation the same day the Commerce Commission said they were taking 3 prosecutions relating to grade 500E seismic steel mesh (used to strengthen concrete slabs and driveways) and Fletcher Steel were “issued with a warning for engaging in conduct that was likely to breach the act for retesting its product in a non-standard manner”.
Before the Kaikoura earthquake happened, Auckland lawyer Adina Thorn’s announced she was likely to be taking a class-action against manufacturers of faulty steel mesh. She has the financial backing of Harbour Litigation Funding, the UK’s largest litigation funder.
Harbour Litigation also funded the NZ$250M class action against the James Hardie group of companies.
The action claims James Hardie was negligent in its design, manufacture and supply of the Harditex and Titanboard cladding systems.
The first Harditex claim was brought by Tracey Cridge and Mark Unwin, who claim their Wellington home suffered widespread internal water damage – estimated to cost more than $300,000 to fix. Another Wellington couple, Katrina Fowler and Scott Woodhead, have also claimed over their 2000 duplex.
Basically Thorn reckons everyone who has had a house built with a concrete slab in the last 5 years should register as they may have a claim.
In September she said
“After the Christchurch earthquakes new standards on ductility were introduced so buildings don’t fall over. Some manufacturers didn’t comply and bought steel from China and Thailand that was not tested, so now the million dollar question is how much is that going to cost?” source: NBR
Insurance claims compromised, risk to life
“This is a problem because, in the advent of a natural disaster, the use of non-complying steel mesh could compromise insurance claims, pose a risk to life and cause widespread financial losses. Its existence could also affect the future and present market value of the buildings concerned.”
She said the issue emerged in March this year when it was revealed that hundreds of thousands of non-complying steel mesh sheets had been supplied to builders throughout New Zealand from mid-2012.
The Ministry then said it was investigating companies that had supplied steel reinforcing mesh to builders and construction firms that did not meet the grade 500E requirement, which relates to the ductility or flexibility of the steel concerned. source
If you’re likely to be affected and are interested in applying for compensation start here SteelClassAction.co.nz faqs
We say if you’ve buying a house in New Zealand, don’t buy one built since 2012 with any amount of steel reinforcement of the concrete slab.If you’ve got one you may like to consider selling now before the crash comes.
If you value your safety don’t work or stay in a multi-storey building built since then if it’s in an area known to experience earthquakes.
You may also be interested in
Chinese steel fails strength test (1 June 2016, Stuff)
Roading bosses are defending their quality control standards after 1600 tonnes of Chinese steel destined for a major Waikato project was found to be below standard.
The substandard steel piles were to be used on four bridges along the Huntly section of the Waikato Expressway.
The 15.2 kilometre-long section is being built by a Fulton Hogan HEB joint venture who purchased the steel from New Zealand company Steel & Tube Holdings…The batch of below-strength steel forced a design rethink for two bridges along the section.
“The solution we have implemented includes a redesign of the steel tube piles, which are now being used as reinforced concrete piles for two of the bridges due to time constraints,” Dickens said in a statement. The roading contractor has since asked Steel & Tube to find replacement steel piles for two other bridges… read on
Two insurers selected for NZ awards – for the wrong reasons (Insurance business online, 7 Dec)
Australian insurer IAG and South African insurer Youi have both been nominated for their negative impact on people, according to the awards’ organisers, the Campaign Against Foreign Control of Aotearoa (CAFCA).
IAG is actually the current title-holder after taking first place in the 2015 awards with judges citing its ‘callous’ Canterbury earthquake dealings which had caused ‘phenomenal and abhorrent’ suffering to the people of Christchurch.
The judges are a group of academics, trade unionists, business people and anti-foreign ownership activists who base their decision according to those who have the most negative impact in categories including people, environment, political interference and economic dominance… source
Claims and rebuttals as steel class action heads towards the furnace (NBR, 23 September 2016)
This article was published before the Kakoura earthquake, and before the Commerce Commission announced its decision to prosecute three companies, including Steel & Tube
The company says it is confident its steel mesh is compliant and therefore there can be no case, even though it has told shareholders in a letter it “inadvertently” used the testing house logo of a well-known engineering company (Holmes Solutions, of Holmes Consulting) which didn’t carry out any testing”… read on
Opportunist builders, dodgy steel and shonky standards create new building crisis ‘worse than leaky homes‘ (published by Stuff.co.nz, 2 weeks before the Kaikoura quake) :
Take a building inspector through the soon-to-be city of Flat Bush in Auckland’s south-east, and watch his hackles rise.
He shakes his head and laments the state of building in New Zealand today. He picks his way through Double Happiness cigarette boxes, jagged bricks sticking out of mud, broken bottles, twisted steel mesh to tut tut at wonky flashings. He – Gerard Ball from Babbage Consultants – notices walls are out of plumb and that polystyrene, plastic bags, and chip packets have drifted into nearby streams.
“Every single building on this street raises red flags for me,” Ball says. “If builders don’t give a damn about what’s visible to the eye, how can they be trusted to properly do things they know can be covered up?”…
…”It’s a self-destructive industry,” says Ball. “Why bother getting trained if you can leap into a job straight away? Why bother impressing the boss with your work ethic when you’re not dependant (sic) on him for your next job? Why bother making a decent job of things when stretched councils don’t have time to inspect thoroughly anyway?”….
A 10-week investigation has identified three key problems:
– Unqualified tradesmen who just can’t count: they under-quote to get the job, measure badly, and cut corners;
– Cheap, substandard steel mesh for reinforcing concrete slabs, much imported from China or Malaysia;
– Materials being bought on overseas websites like Ali Baba for a fraction of their price at New Zealand hardware wholesalers and retailers – and without any of the quality certification… read on
10 thoughts on “Steel Mesh Nightmare Looms for Thousands of NZ Property Owners, Worse than Leaky Homes Crisis. Steel Used in Roads and Bridges Too.”
Related: leaky homes, the next generation
Brown wants to know why there is a moratorium on compensation for leaky homes after 10 years.
“Typically, houses start to show symptoms after that time. That’s scary, because after 10 years, no-one can be held responsible, and the owners get stuck with the repair costs.”
So … there is a law in place … that stops holding builders accountable in the period of time AFTER the damage becomes apparent.
Sounds like a law that exists to put the checks in boxes.
I recently purchased a house in Oz and have one foot out of this horrid, disrespectful country with the other one soon to follow. I will not miss this rip off poor excuse for a country one little bit.
Hopefully admin will be able to post today’s Herald headline regarding the exploitation of migrants before the government spin Drs have the Herald remove it
Big steel framed building going up in Auckland soon ,should be good to watch the retards buy the worlds most untested melted down ships from India to construct the framework from ,when it starts to lean over and buckle they’ll claim they had no idea and independent testing had been carried out in Somalia so it’s really no ones fault,thankfully the insurance company is Swiss so it won’t cost N.Z anything ,just demolish it and build another one at someone else’s expense.
The international reinsurers have become aware that New Zealand’s commercial building standards are nowhere near as good as purported. In fact, I met one man who worked as a reinsurance executive in natural catastrophe compared New Zealand business standards to those in Turkey, where it is common knowledge that the building construction is so poor. The high number of severely damaged buildings in Wellington following the recent earthquake, despite the distance from the epicentre, is disconcerting. A direct earthquake underneath Wellington will level the city and kill thousands.
Not much can really be done due to the limited building space available in Wellington ,maybe not building high rise buildings would be the best option due to unstable ground ,limited road access in and out of the city and the fact that the city is built on a fault line ,this information has been around for many years however Kiwis have proven to be a nation of risk takers and gamblers.
Also Fletchers ,the main supplier of building materials in N.Z are also actively involved with govt in setting building standards .
Living in many parts of New Zealand is waiting for a disaster to happen. Moreover the prices of food, services and other basic stuff are way to high for what you get. John Key stopped his job before the housing bubble will burst. No wonder thew are so many frustrated sick people in New Zealand. It’s to expensive to live in. ‘Housing Housing Housing’ its pathetic. What a disgraceful façade.
Anyonbe who has owned a house in New Zealand knows the shoddy quality of building there. I had a house that after only 10 years should have been razed. You are better off living in a cardboard box!
Unfortunately it’s now a problem globally,buildings failing,falling down and leaking everywhere,cost and corner cutting are part of the problem now coupled with defective building products ,I find it very hard to blame the builders for the shoddy product application as here in N.Z you have about one choice for who you buy the building products from and although it maybe flagged under a different name it will be Fletchers .
Comments are closed.